Universal apps are failing

elindalyne

New member
Aug 1, 2015
352
0
0
Visit site
I think you underestimate how bad some people are with computers. Even if the desktop app is literally a re-skinned version of their website, this is ideal for non computer savy people. A direct line is better for those with little computer literacy than a website.
 

cracgor

New member
Feb 21, 2013
666
0
0
Visit site
I think you underestimate how bad some people are with computers. Even if the desktop app is literally a re-skinned version of their website, this is ideal for non computer savy people. A direct line is better for those with little computer literacy than a website.

Do you mean for the Starbucks app on mobile? I think it's very possible that the universal app platform may lead to more apps on PC, but probably not as many as I would like. And then they probably won't lead to the great mobile apps we want.
 

Dan TheMan86

New member
Nov 30, 2012
171
0
0
Visit site
Also, as easy as this should be, like Nadella failed to explain, a Starbucks app, Lowe's app, Bank of America app, or any other mobile app makes little sense to put on a PC. You don't interact the same with them. And so there is little chance of leveraging PC to get phone apps.

My thoughts exactly
 

Musicman247

New member
Aug 29, 2006
802
0
0
www.splashblog.com
I wonder if it would help to have Clippy pop up in Visual Studio and say, "I see you're making an app for the PC. Would you like help formatting it for a mobile device as well?"
 

cracgor

New member
Feb 21, 2013
666
0
0
Visit site
I wonder if it would help to have Clippy pop up in Visual Studio and say, "I see you're making an app for the PC. Would you like help formatting it for a mobile device as well?"

I wonder I they could put MS Bob on the phone. Everyone knows that was ahead of its time. Maybe we are ready!
 

SeeVuPlay

Member
Apr 3, 2011
340
0
16
Visit site
The guy who led Microsoft to it's failure in mobile is now telling them that their strategy for mobile is going to fail. If only he hadn't laughed at the iPhone...
 

7a2eer

Banned
Oct 6, 2015
95
0
0
Visit site
I'll rephrase.

Windows 10 mobile is not available to officially download to the masses. It's available on two phones.

Once Windows 10 mobile is released globally and people are able to upgrade, the apps will come.

Who is going to develop these apps? You??
I am a developer, tell me why I should put hundreds of hours of work into the UWP. Is it because I should love and worship a corporation like Microsoft?
It irks me to see comments like yours, how Microsoft does "X" and apps magically appear in the store. Who is developing these apps??? TELL ME :grin:

I don't want your 0.99 and it seems like Microsoft doesn't either ...

____

Ballmer has a point. Astoria is on hiatus, and no other interesting alternatives have been proposed. The Islandwood bridge is actually bad for the Store, as maintaining WP code is on the back burner by design. With all the talent at Microsoft, has it not once occurred to them to create a better Xamarin?? Target Windows and export to iOS/Android.
 

7a2eer

Banned
Oct 6, 2015
95
0
0
Visit site
The guy who led Microsoft to it's failure in mobile is now telling them that their strategy for mobile is going to fail. If only he hadn't laughed at the iPhone...

But the iPhone didn't have a stylus or a keyboard :^)
iOS at release was terrible, so was Android.

Of course Ballmer was laughing them off, a lot of people did. What kind of smartphone doesn't record video? lol
 

7a2eer

Banned
Oct 6, 2015
95
0
0
Visit site
Also, as easy as this should be, like Nadella failed to explain, a Starbucks app, Lowe's app, Bank of America app, or any other mobile app makes little sense to put on a PC. You don't interact the same with them. And so there is little chance of leveraging PC to get phone apps.

The predominant design pattern in UWP app development is MVVM.
 

chmun77

New member
May 27, 2011
681
0
0
Visit site
I'll rephrase.

Windows 10 mobile is not available to officially download to the masses. It's available on two phones.

Once Windows 10 mobile is released globally and people are able to upgrade, the apps will come.

Wow... So how "officially" are you expecting?? As for the rest of the phones, those are considering as OS updates. Officially, Windows 10 mobile IS already released with the launch of the NEW phones.

Anyways, back to the topic. Universal apps or not, all depending on efforts by developers. At the end of the day, if devs are not even keen with such small market OS - 1.6% to be precise, so much for apps being universal. This platform is dead..... Furthermore, Satya's vision is to promote Microsoft cloud and services to every corner of the Earth. He doesn't care if windows phone is selling or not.
 

chmun77

New member
May 27, 2011
681
0
0
Visit site
Who is going to develop these apps? You??
I am a developer, tell me why I should put hundreds of hours of work into the UWP. Is it because I should love and worship a corporation like Microsoft?
It irks me to see comments like yours, how Microsoft does "X" and apps magically appear in the store. Who is developing these apps??? TELL ME :grin:

I don't want your 0.99 and it seems like Microsoft doesn't either ...

____

Ballmer has a point. Astoria is on hiatus, and no other interesting alternatives have been proposed. The Islandwood bridge is actually bad for the Store, as maintaining WP code is on the back burner by design. With all the talent at Microsoft, has it not once occurred to them to create a better Xamarin?? Target Windows and export to iOS/Android.

He is one of those hardcore fans still living on the ivory tower of windows phone. Not knowing that in fact the tower is already collapsing. They are just beating the dead horse.
 

chmun77

New member
May 27, 2011
681
0
0
Visit site
Sure it makes it easier to make an app on one device and put it on every device, or easy for users to move from device to device.

My reason for starting this thread is I see no compelling reason to believe having an app on your computer will save mobile. Maybe it is because I'm in the windows ecosystem but I thought universal apps were going to get PC apps to mobile, but I don't see that happening. The problem with universal apps is many apps are suited for 1 type of device. We are missing mobile apps, and I do not see any reason to compel developers to make an app on the universal platform to take advantage of mobile if it does not already exist.

TBH, I'm already on windows 10 on my desktop and notebook. Yet I'm have not install any apps from the store so far. I still prefer using x84/x64 apps or to be better, I can simply user my Firefox (not a fan of Edge or IE) to accomplish my tasks and also for entertainment.
 

DavidinCT

Active member
Feb 18, 2011
3,310
0
36
Visit site
Steve Ballmer is correct in this newest article. Universal apps are destined to fail. They have been present for I don't know exactly, a year? I was always excited to see them in the store, even though rarely. It does seem that they go mostly from the phone to PC which makes sense. It is easy to do and a developer can go from the small population of Windows Mobile users to the large audience of PC users. It is kind of dumb to make the effort the other way around, since you still have to provide updates and time.

Also, as easy as this should be, like Nadella failed to explain, a Starbucks app, Lowe's app, Bank of America app, or any other mobile app makes little sense to put on a PC. You don't interact the same with them. And so there is little chance of leveraging PC to get phone apps.

The thing is, Universal apps are new... A project like this will take MONTHS if not years to find out of it really is successful. No one has a clue if they will or wont work.

Windows Phone is the bigger question here. So, devs now wont make an app for Windows Phone....maybe they love their iPhone, or Android device, or they just think that it's not going anywhere (with Microsoft saying they are not chasing the market, I see their point) So they start making an app for Windows 10 PC (10 million people have it, good amount of people, great exposure), If they don't like Windows Phone for some reason, why would they even make an app for Windows Phone ? Why bother ?

Will this SAVE Windows Phone ? Who knows but, we should all hope it does. Microsoft is taking a back seat on Windows Phone now, NOT chasing the market, releasing only 3 devices a year but, no promotion and only for the fans/corporate users. This is a VERY bad thing. Microsoft has done this type of thing in the past.

I give it 2 years.. This is Microsoft's check time, If the Market place has not really grown (so we get 10 apps but, we lose 12 apps, it goes no place), and the market share is still sitting around 3-4%. Microsoft will put an end to Windows Phone.

I have been following Microsoft as a company from the Windows 3.0 days, I have been following news, podcasts and any other outlets, I have seen how Microsoft does business.

This could be the start of the end if things don't pick up....but, this is with out big money for advertisements and BUYING apps from Microsoft...

Trust me when I say it, Microsoft has done this type of thing before.....but, that was over a few million dollars....Windows Phone has cost Microsoft in the BILLIONS. Think about it..
 

ajj3085

New member
Aug 29, 2013
276
0
0
Visit site
Lets look at an example of a Universal app, Huetro for Hue by Neils Laute, Neils has supported WP and Windows but now he only has to make one app that runs on the one platform, so he can concentrate on just one thing saving time and money, for me I only need download one app on whatever platform I want it on, and I only have to show my wife one app and that saves me so much time and effort you wouldn't believe it.

But for other developers who have been on one platform or the other, now just they just have the one, for all the people who reckon PC users can just use a web login, now they have a reason to think of apps, because not all PC users use desktops, some of us use phones, some small tablets, some use transformers and there are even one or two traditional PC's about, the point is Windows isn't just a dying OS stuck on PC's, it's a young upstart that can run on almost anything including fridges.

Developers will want to be involved because this is going somewhere now.

I'm hoping companies keep in mind that people prefer apps over websites. Even on a desktop i do, i use the facebook app and weather apps instead of going to the browser for example.
 

anon(6078578)

New member
Jun 8, 2013
662
0
0
Visit site
The thing is, Universal apps are new... A project like this will take MONTHS if not years to find out of it really is successful. No one has a clue if they will or wont work.

Windows Phone is the bigger question here. So, devs now wont make an app for Windows Phone....maybe they love their iPhone, or Android device, or they just think that it's not going anywhere (with Microsoft saying they are not chasing the market, I see their point) So they start making an app for Windows 10 PC (10 million people have it, good amount of people, great exposure), If they don't like Windows Phone for some reason, why would they even make an app for Windows Phone ? Why bother ?

Will this SAVE Windows Phone ? Who knows but, we should all hope it does. Microsoft is taking a back seat on Windows Phone now, NOT chasing the market, releasing only 3 devices a year but, no promotion and only for the fans/corporate users. This is a VERY bad thing. Microsoft has done this type of thing in the past.

I give it 2 years.. This is Microsoft's check time, If the Market place has not really grown (so we get 10 apps but, we lose 12 apps, it goes no place), and the market share is still sitting around 3-4%. Microsoft will put an end to Windows Phone.

I have been following Microsoft as a company from the Windows 3.0 days, I have been following news, podcasts and any other outlets, I have seen how Microsoft does business.

This could be the start of the end if things don't pick up....but, this is with out big money for advertisements and BUYING apps from Microsoft...

Trust me when I say it, Microsoft has done this type of thing before.....but, that was over a few million dollars....Windows Phone has cost Microsoft in the BILLIONS. Think about it..
I think 2 years is still too long. I give it 12 months. If it hasn't improved the situation on Windows Phone by then, I can't see it ever doing so.
 

WillysJeepMan

Active member
Aug 7, 2008
1,066
0
36
Visit site
I wonder I they could put MS Bob on the phone. Everyone knows that was ahead of its time. Maybe we are ready!
Perhaps.

IMO, Microsoft is done-done in the mobile space. When I think about where they were 10-12 years ago on top and how many golden opportunities they've squandered since then, how many times they've tried to reboot their offerings. Universal apps is just another attempt at life support.

Long before the iPhone was a glimmer in Steve Jobs' eye, I was using Windows Mobile (Pocket PC OS) smartphones as my primary computing device on business trips. That was 12+ years ago.
 

7a2eer

Banned
Oct 6, 2015
95
0
0
Visit site
Would it be so evil to port Windows Runtime to Android?
  1. It would benefit all the Windows Developers as their apps could be run on Android. They would be making more money, giving them the opportunity to devote more resources on their projects.
  2. It would incentivize new developers to target Windows first, as they would be exposed to two platforms
  3. A translator similar to Islandwood could be designed to get Android developers onboard the UWP.

Of course there's the issue of getting people to use Windows Phone. Marketshare is not resolved this way. It is obvious that most Windows Phone users are enthusiasts, just look at the percentage of users on W10M technical preview :winktongue:
But the answer to this is a simple question: Why do we need marketshare? If Microsoft has stolen Android from Google, they would already be making revenue from their store. Would be great if it were possible to maintain factories and produce smaller quantities, strictly flagships.

Microsoft has inlets already, i.e partnership with CyanogenMod, Samsung, etc to have their apps preinstalled. Imagine an Android phone that comes preinstalled with native Windows apps, a Windows launcher, and a Microsoft store. Microsoft doesn't need the underlying OS to be Windows to own it! This is exactly how Google stole Java developers from Oracle! (Obviously it worked well)

There's so much more Microsoft can do with Universal Apps, Windows, and their Phones. They need to have a clear vision otherwise nobody will care for their products.
 

R0bR

New member
Jan 24, 2012
73
0
0
Visit site
Do you mean for the Starbucks app on mobile? I think it's very possible that the universal app platform may lead to more apps on PC, but probably not as many as I would like. And then they probably won't lead to the great mobile apps we want.

Your question on how a Kroger Grocery app would benefit from UWP is the perfect example. Kroger could develop one app to run on Windows 10, as you research what you want to cook for dinner on recipe apps with your PC\Tablet you share ingredients to your Kroger app to build your grocery list. If you go to your fridge to make dinner you realize that you need eggs so you add it to the same app on your fridge IoTs display, much easier then going to grab your PC\Tablet. You're now at Kroger and you pull out your 950XL and launch the same Kroger app as you shop for what you added to your grocery list.

Just because you don't think there is a use for the same app on multiple devices may only mean you don't have a vision for it, plenty of developers do. The big question is WILL the developers find the benefits of UWP worth developing for or not, for that it is too early to tell.
 

cracgor

New member
Feb 21, 2013
666
0
0
Visit site
But the iPhone didn't have a stylus or a keyboard :^)
iOS at release was terrible, so was Android.

Of course Ballmer was laughing them off, a lot of people did. What kind of smartphone doesn't record video? lol

At least it didn't take two years to figure out copy and paste...(I'm pointing at you WP7).
 

cracgor

New member
Feb 21, 2013
666
0
0
Visit site
Perhaps.

IMO, Microsoft is done-done in the mobile space. When I think about where they were 10-12 years ago on top and how many golden opportunities they've squandered since then, how many times they've tried to reboot their offerings. Universal apps is just another attempt at life support.

Long before the iPhone was a glimmer in Steve Jobs' eye, I was using Windows Mobile (Pocket PC OS) smartphones as my primary computing device on business trips. That was 12+ years ago.

Every time they reboot the system, they take it back a couple steps. At least the other OSes improve on previous work.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
323,303
Messages
2,243,603
Members
428,055
Latest member
DrPendragon