Lumia 920 camera bug after Amber update

[supershi80]

yes but the image are still amazing, or I am used to this algorithms made by nokia in amber.

The images before postprocessing are amazing, after instead are too soft and the chromatic color is wrong.
Is very simple to see ;-)

 

[anon(7900571)]

The images before postprocessing are amazing, after instead are too soft and the chromatic color is wrong.
Is very simple to see ;-)

hope nokia fix this all ASAP.Juha come on please fix this issue, its been ages you haven't fixed it :/ it's high time now

 

[alpha beta gaga]

The images before postprocessing are amazing, after instead are too soft and the chromatic color is wrong.
Is very simple to see ;-)

so the four images (post-processing) i put up yesterday in both threads are also too 'soft'? yes? the same images that someone quoted as being 'amazing'. i'm looking only for your comments on the 4 images i have posted.

 

[supershi80]

so the four images (post-processing) i put up yesterday in both threads are also too soft? yes? the same images that someone quoted as being 'amazing'.

Yes, I confirm you that are soft. If you want see the real capacity of 920 take the same photos before and after the postprocessing and you can see the big difference in term of quality.

 

[alpha beta gaga]

Yes, I confirm you that are soft. If you want see the real capacity of 920 take the same photos before and after the postprocessing and you can see the big difference in term of quality.

ridiculous. i think you need a new monitor. glasses. or both.

 

[supershi80]

ridiculous. i think you need a new monitor. glasses. or both.

You can change your eyes ;-)

 

[Senad Klepic]

I don't know whats with you guys, but before PP colors (here) are not correct but after PP they are. The shaprnes is lost a bit but the colors are accurate. End telling someone (colors are correct don't know how can you know better then the picture taker who sees the object).

 

[supershi80]

I don't know whats with you guys, but before PP colors (here) are not correct but after PP they are. The shaprnes is lost a bit but the colors are accurate. End telling someone (colors are correct don't know how can you know better then the picture taker who sees the object).

Are you sure?

See my photos in the other thread "Lumia 920 photo quality post black update" page 1, post 21
See photos in the other thread "Lumia 920 photo quality post black update" page 1, post 6
See more review in other sites (if you want I send you some links ;-) ) and thread in other forums in all the world and you can see that the white balance (and colors) after the postprocessing is wrong.

And the sharpness is not lost a bit but a lot ;-) (is very simple to see it you look at the table in the last photos of Himanshu Chowdhary)

 

[Rodrigo Mendes]

Are you sure?

See my photos in the other thread "Lumia 920 photo quality post black update" page 1, post 21
See photos in the other thread "Lumia 920 photo quality post black update" page 1, post 6
See more review in other site (if you want I send you some links ;-) ) and thread in other forums in all the world and you can see that the white balance (and colors) after the postprocessing is wrong.

And the sharpness is not lost a bit but a lot ;-)

You prove your point, but still that, Lumia 920 c?mera make outstading results. Better than Galaxy s4 (wich have a good c?mera) or Iphone 5s (wich have only a ok c?mera).

I agree with you, Nokia needs to look for 920 agressive postprocess, but results still very good.

 

[supershi80]

You prove your point, but still that, Lumia 920 c?mera make outstading results. Better than Galaxy s4 (wich have a good c?mera) or Iphone 5s (wich have only a ok c?mera).

I agree with you, Nokia needs to look for 920 agressive postprocess, but results still very good.

All the comparisons (that I see) on the web between Iphone5 and 920 always wins Iphone5 (and I think Iphone5s is better that 5)
Also GalaxyIII more times wins on 920

Bye example (a comment by a review taked from the web):
"The Nokia Lumia 920 yields a high amount of noise, and there is a lot of softening happening on the device. This makes for less distinct images, lacking a bit in sharpness.
The Apple iPhone 5 and Samsung Galaxy S III performed similarly to each other - detail was relatively high, with noise in check. They are our favorites here."

Then, can you explain me why you say that 920 is better that Iphone5s and GS4 ?

 

[Senad Klepic]

Maybe i wrote wrong, sharpnes gets too soft i agree on that .
But take a look at my picture of the screwdriver while it indeed its more pleasant to look at (vivd colors) its over saturated while after PP is closer to the natural one.

Actually i agree, my buddy has the GS4 and the pictures are mostly better on my L920. And on the web there are many comparisons, while the GS4 wins in landscape pictures ( because of the softnes of the L920 ) in macro and night shots the lumia is the better one.
If you take in the account that the L925 isn't that much better in camera then the L920, and keeping in mind the L925/L1020/I5s showdown you can see that it holds its ground. ( i said that the L925 isn't much better after looking into another showdown on wpcentral L920/L925/L1020 ). By all these examples i think we can say for sure GSIII and I5 ain't really better then the L920.

 

[supershi80]

Maybe i wrote wrong, sharpnes gets too soft i agree on that .
But take a look at my picture of the screwdriver while it indeed its more pleasant to look at (vivd colors) its over saturated while after PP is closer to the natural one.

I can only believe you about the colors on the photo of the screw because I don't see with my eyes the real image, but I can confirm you that with three 920 (one is mine, other two is of my friends) all the photos that I create have wrong WB

PS
See the yellow of the screwdriver, I suppose (because I don't see the with my eyes) that is not correct in the photo after the postprocessing

 

[supershi80]

By all these examples i think we can say for sure GSIII and I5 ain't really better then the L920.

I'm not soo sure :-( the 920 postprocessing is terrible

 

[Senad Klepic]

Hmm Iphone5s is better then L920, but I5 by no mean ( at least what i saw till now ).

 

[MrWhiteman]

so the four images (post-processing) i put up yesterday in both threads are also too 'soft'? yes? the same images that someone quoted as being 'amazing'. i'm looking only for your comments on the 4 images i have posted.

Even Himanshu's 'after' pictures still look nice until you compare them with the before pictures. It's a matter of perspective, the images look nice until they are side-by-side with their unprocessed counterparts. It's like thinking your girlfriend is sexy until she stands next to a supermodel, suddenly she doesn't look sexy any more.

Another way of putting it is I think my car looks quite nice but when I park next to a top end Mercedes it looks like a piece of crap. It's all about perspective.

 

[N_LaRUE]

my 808 takes much better pics than this. -_-

You can't compare the 808 to the L920. It's completely different system. It's like comparing your 808 to a DSLR.

Try comparing it to the 1020.

 

[hope4wp]

After looking at your pics I think we should stop reviewing our photo....and can you please show this to that twitter guy??

 

[hope4wp]

You can't compare the 808 to the L920. It's completely different system. It's like comparing your 808 to a DSLR.

Try comparing it to the 1020.

soon enough I'll compare lol

 

[mariusmuntean]

He can show this to the twitter camera guy, but nothing will happen. That blindo refuses to admit that there is a problem...

 

[AndrewL920]

He can show this to the twitter camera guy, but nothing will happen. That blindo refuses to admit that there is a problem...

I will tell him he needs to quit as a Camera Guy of Nokia and also I'll tell him he need an eye doctor.