Vitor Salvatore Pierce
New member
Not necessarily. As I said, the post processing includes the compressing and encoding, so you might get some artifacts or another issues.
It turns out that the PP of GDR1 was better...
Not necessarily. As I said, the post processing includes the compressing and encoding, so you might get some artifacts or another issues.
It turns out that the PP of GDR1 was better...
I don't exclude that, it's very probable. Simply because the software processing is apparently changing...
The problem is the firmware which handling the camera of the device, while the hardware of the camera looks good, however, the more they update the more it become a nightmare. That's something Microsoft need to solve now, I think the Cyan update is not improving anything at the camera because I had a chance to play with the Lumia 930 already.
Sample photo of Nexus 5, everything's auto:
http://i.imgur.com/oXeKs0R.jpg
I dont know about pictures because I bought the lumia 920 to record videos, when I bought the lumia it had black and after a few weeks I installed portico and the differencies are big, with similar conditions the amount of detail and the sharpness is incredible, especially with the grass or anything close to the camera on portico you can see every detail while in black everything is blurred and with low detail.
What I realized is that in Black uses more noise reduction, and that ends up leaving the photo less sharp and more blurry too.
I was viewing some photos taken with the N8, 2010...Yes, and indeed, translate the processing algorithm in to normal language of cosumer is "bad quality", that's it! People don't get the reason, if the camera wants to prove it's good, it needs to give the good quality as 'auto' settings
The problem of Nokia is in these factors:
-Loss of contrast
-Loss of "clarity" (let the black more defined, giving impression of sharpness)
-Loss of colors
-White balance
-Prioritize high ISO, even when you don't have to