power5
New member
Type cover would be impossible to type on connected to the phone. Lay a piece of paper down the same size as your phone and try to put an entire qwerty keyboard on it and then be able to type on it in any way besides maybe 2 finger touch.
Better option would be to have a laser keyboard option projected from a corner when the integrated rear kickstand is popped out of the back. Though laser keyboards have never been very good. So it would take some serious R&D and probably an acquisition to make it work as well as it would need to. Maybe their lack of quality is due to some sort of processing limitation in their hardware and a pocket computer could help. The thought has been dangled for years on so many concept phones, but has not been tried by anyone. Maybe there is a reason.
I want a phone that can run x86 when needed. Not sure how to safely do that with all the malware out there. Somehow it needs to still have a sandbox. Not sure if windows 10 for surface is designed that way but probably not since it's full on windows. I am not sure how much space is available on a <6" screen phone to put an intel chip and an arm chip. Pretty sure arm is using different ram in mobile devices than Microsoft is in the surface with intel chips. So you would need double the ram space and double the processor space. You would basically need 2 motherboards. At least I think that is true. Not a computer engineer, just going off the basics. No idea why arm needs to stay around. Intel has seriously caught up in the power level arena while destroying arm in processing power. You want apps? How about every app that is available in the windows store for desktop/laptop/surface/surface book? You think that would bring developers over? Instead of only being able to sell your app to phone users, you can sell your app to anyone with any sort of windows 10 device. Desktop, laptop, surface, other tablet, phone. Do you think snapchat would like your computer as well as your phone? Sure they would, same with nearly every other developer. Unity apps would evolve into an app that can flow seamlessly from phone, to ext. monitor, to tablet, to surface book, to desktop. Apps could still be designed for a single device if desired.
Instead of a continuum dock, how about a wireless dongle to plug into the monitor housed in back of the phone? Combine that with a laser keyboard that works decently and I could have a computer anywhere I need.
Would love to see the phone just become a sort of continuum screen for some things. Sort of like the chrome books. Yet have the ability to also run local apps. So for the embedded apps, you would run them from the local device. Phone, maps, texting, camera, contacts, email.... Those things you use almost if not every day. Then, all those dumb game apps you download and use maybe a handful of times, they are played on the cloud and the video is streamed to your device. No loss of device storage required. But if it turns into a game you love and cannot live without, you press the option to make it local on the device. Not sure the bandwidth of even 4g is up to this task though. I have a hard enough time streaming Netflix when my phone is updating an app. Or maybe a stop gap is to allow an SD card have any app installed on it, not just the phone internal memory. So as I grow to use my phone for more and more apps and stuff, I can put in a larger SD card. Similar to what we did with HDDs in our PCs before terabyte drives were commonplace.
Better option would be to have a laser keyboard option projected from a corner when the integrated rear kickstand is popped out of the back. Though laser keyboards have never been very good. So it would take some serious R&D and probably an acquisition to make it work as well as it would need to. Maybe their lack of quality is due to some sort of processing limitation in their hardware and a pocket computer could help. The thought has been dangled for years on so many concept phones, but has not been tried by anyone. Maybe there is a reason.
I want a phone that can run x86 when needed. Not sure how to safely do that with all the malware out there. Somehow it needs to still have a sandbox. Not sure if windows 10 for surface is designed that way but probably not since it's full on windows. I am not sure how much space is available on a <6" screen phone to put an intel chip and an arm chip. Pretty sure arm is using different ram in mobile devices than Microsoft is in the surface with intel chips. So you would need double the ram space and double the processor space. You would basically need 2 motherboards. At least I think that is true. Not a computer engineer, just going off the basics. No idea why arm needs to stay around. Intel has seriously caught up in the power level arena while destroying arm in processing power. You want apps? How about every app that is available in the windows store for desktop/laptop/surface/surface book? You think that would bring developers over? Instead of only being able to sell your app to phone users, you can sell your app to anyone with any sort of windows 10 device. Desktop, laptop, surface, other tablet, phone. Do you think snapchat would like your computer as well as your phone? Sure they would, same with nearly every other developer. Unity apps would evolve into an app that can flow seamlessly from phone, to ext. monitor, to tablet, to surface book, to desktop. Apps could still be designed for a single device if desired.
Instead of a continuum dock, how about a wireless dongle to plug into the monitor housed in back of the phone? Combine that with a laser keyboard that works decently and I could have a computer anywhere I need.
Would love to see the phone just become a sort of continuum screen for some things. Sort of like the chrome books. Yet have the ability to also run local apps. So for the embedded apps, you would run them from the local device. Phone, maps, texting, camera, contacts, email.... Those things you use almost if not every day. Then, all those dumb game apps you download and use maybe a handful of times, they are played on the cloud and the video is streamed to your device. No loss of device storage required. But if it turns into a game you love and cannot live without, you press the option to make it local on the device. Not sure the bandwidth of even 4g is up to this task though. I have a hard enough time streaming Netflix when my phone is updating an app. Or maybe a stop gap is to allow an SD card have any app installed on it, not just the phone internal memory. So as I grow to use my phone for more and more apps and stuff, I can put in a larger SD card. Similar to what we did with HDDs in our PCs before terabyte drives were commonplace.
Last edited: