So in grad school we had a guy, I'll call him Jacob to protect his identity. So old Jacob was one of those second career folks - Jewish lawyer late in years wanting to do a career change to social work. As he was an older guy who was also well read, he could be a bit of a steamroller in class and go on and on if permitted. One of my favorite courses was called Diversity and Oppression. Here's the official course summary:
"Introduces a range of diverse populations by race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, and physical differences. Additionally, it examines the role, function, and effects of oppression in society as it relates to social and economic justice. Assumptions underlying theory and research methodologies from which basic constructs of human behavior are drawn will be examined to understand how power and other dynamics manage and sustain oppression at the individual and institutional levels. Also of interest is how oppression affects service delivery at micro and macro levels, particularly social policies and strategic planning which drive the shape of services."
What was cool about this as when I took it, the professor was the student liason. So he would give more rope to the discussions getting rough and tumble and using a ton of contemporary cultural references.
Why the essay? Well we got into a roughouse about trauma one lecture. Jacob didn't back down as he dipped into his cultural reference of the Holocaust. Now, we had like 2 people who looked like Laura in the whole class of 25, with everyone else looking like Libra or Mr. Clue. So went Jacob went in, some of the more militant brown folk took him to task about chattel slavery.
What did little old me say? That we were having a Richard swinging contest on trauma that was working as intended for our imperial masters to maintain control. So why can't we respect the events of someone else's traumatic experience and focus on the common feelings we have as being traumatized groups and heal that way?
Perspective is important indeed.