Features are nice and Apple certain has a lot of them. They have done a great job of starting with a solid foundation and year after year iterating on that, making their products better and better. MS ha some great feature too and will be binging more, but on these features, its going to be a while.
As for iOS, those features come with a price. A monetary price (only an iPhone has iOS and they are very expensive), but they also require you to buy into an all-Apple world. Continuity is great, but only if you also have a MAC. Air Play is great, but only if you have an Apple TV. These are great solutions, but not everyone is willing to sell out completely to one company for everything. The world MS is building is not like this. Its using more open standards that give you more choices. You have an Xbox or other miracast/dlna capable device hooked to your TV, you can choose what you want and use it.
Also, features only matter if you actually will use them. A large number of people never do. What I have always liked and preferred about WP is the focus on the core experience - the things we all are in and out of hourly on our phones. I'm frustrated from time to time by the constant resets and loss of features, but every time I start looking at iOS or Android with all their apps and features, the core experience of WP brings me back. Obviously others will make other choices for different reasons.
Hi.
A couple of notes. I don't understand what you mean by Core features. But I agree that having a great app launcher is a must and MS tile based system is something of a genius. Very nice. Having said this I spend more time in apps then in the start screen and that is a problem.
I'm the kind of person that thinks that $600 or 600 Euros is a frontier to the law of diminished returns when it comes to Smartphones. I also think that Apple is being petty with the 16GB this time around. It not that I feel that its customers are entitled to that to more memory for the same price, but is more so a question of consumer trust that the company will try to give customer overall the best price for the features it provides. I don't think in this case Apple following this idea as it did on iPhone 3GS that came out at $599. That is bad.
I understand that features only matter if people use them. But if you consider the market of accessories such as Airplay enabled speakers and home theaters, multimedia docking station and so on, I bet the number of people interested and using it is not as small as you may think. In fact I would attribute the boom of services such as Spotify to these features as it reinforces these kinds of services.
But here is the opportunity. Windows does not have to come up with all the features to do well if it does not try to go head to head with Apple in terms of device prices. Any Windows Phone should cost at most $150 euros less then an iPhone to stand a chance for fast adoption as well as keeping with the quality of the device. I don't understand how I can buy a Lumia 930, an excellent well built piece of kit for something between 250 and 350 and then buy a comparatively cheap plastic Windows Phone the 640XL for 250. I don't understand how the Lumia 930 can cost these values today and when it came a year ago it cost over $600. For me as a Customer is quite confusing, I just don't get it. Its speculative.
Wouldn't it be better if MS did what Apple is doing, That is lower the price of last year flagships and keep them up to date and launch new flagships, rather then having the Lumia 700 and 800 device range?
Here is another one I don't get. You are quite correct that to take the most out of an iDevice ou need a Mac, in particular with Continuity. This is annoying since Mac aren't fluent in the market as Windows is. But imagine if MS implemented these features between Windows Phones and Windows PC's, leaving Android out. Would you blame them? Wouldn't this make more sense then marketing a new smartphone that can work like a PC suggesting that it can replace it, instead of working better together? If MS came now with the ability to stream XBOX One games to a Windows Phone, Windows Phone only, would you blame them? Wouldn't this resonate more with the young generation that Continuum for Windows Phones?
The state of Windows Phone little todo with lack of knowledge from customers, lack of marketing, Apple stealing ideas or mindless customers. It has simple todo with bad product management. Just that, A company the resources and power of MS we can conclude this. Nothing else.
You mention that MS does not implement an effective alternative to Airplay as it wants to support standards such as Miracast and DLNA. Look, from the point of usability and reliance this tech does not cut it. MS in past as deviated from standards to develop its own vision so?
Honestly, why spend time and resources in Continuum for Windows Phones when something like above would be IMHO far more marketable, avoiding embarrassing presentations such as the one given by Joe Belfiori on this theme?