I believe that if I follow a set of strict guidelines and principles, I can satisfy my curiosity to continually question certain things that are out of my direct line of scope and control (science)
I believe if I follow a strict set of guidelines, it will allows me to live my life in a particular manner and handle situations that are outside of my direct line of scope and or control (religion)
Sounds like there is a lot more common between both. Devil is always in the details, or points of focus.
Perhaps it is I who have done the oversimplification here and the scientists and clergy are right. Maybe it's a cop out to take the middle road. Eh, that's my stance though - at least it allows me to walk in either camp temporarily when "appropriate".
Not sure I agree with those definitions...
I'm not into the whole war with science and religion.
They're completely different to me and to try and make them agree is simply messing around with words.
Science is play, curiosity, exploring, questioning and consensus.
Religion is not and I mean religion, not belief. There is a difference.
That's simplification but that's how I see it.
Religion has nothing to say about science or to add to it except to try to confine it or reduce it.
It's up to an individual if you want to know if science agrees with your religion but for me it doesn't and never will.